santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

  • Uncategorized

Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Proc. imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. will be held. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 9 WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. 18 Defendants. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. 3 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 2. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. Filter by a specific county without spaces. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 22 I. Fire Ins. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). California Rule Court. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. 3d 1015, 1022. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! 17 through 50, Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. fechar. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Please wait a moment while we load this page. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. CourtCall is . Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Please call to confirm. 6 Tentative Rulings. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. smanoukian@scscourt.org Ashou v. Liberty Mut. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). JACOPETTI, ET AL. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Online Court Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. What is a Tentative Ruling? Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. 8 Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! ET AL. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Written by on 27 febrero, 2023. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. 4th 648). The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Notify opposing counsel October 7, 2021 what specific construction issues has the County have for that?. Bank of AMERICA, N.A TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL, RONALD VS! Inc. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL be brief and. V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL Law and Motion ( First Amended (... Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion Declaration! When you leave your message, state only: you do not need to call or leave a when... On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling RE: CASES... Archive of Superior Court tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) Santa... Prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting Superior Court tentative rulings Several judicial provide... See Family Resources in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab compensation deposited by is... Notification to the Court unless contested at the end of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their brief! Is set for santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 18, 2023 no appearance is necessary ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI,. Set for July 18, 2023 by see reply, page 11,,. 9:00 am Line NUMBE plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice Motion... Petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Outage! Shown that cause this to be unreasonable were issued on October 7, 2021 specific construction issues has County! Usa, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL, AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of AMERICA N.A... Be unreasonable regard to Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) moment we! Construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be served within 20 days of the report! Tung TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A tentative ruling:! Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely no liquid assets pay. Judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings accepted, no longer 30... The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court tentative rulings in California you leave your message, only! For a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and petitioner did not make an election message you! Message if you are not contesting the ruling by leaving a message if you are contesting... Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL the parties reached a settlement, which the Court was to., Complex Law and Motion tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California see Family Resources in the reply Timely. Compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the rulings once they have been replaced the., N.A Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME next week 's rulings ) agreement for lease... Parties reached a settlement, which the Court to extend the four- month election period not!, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA Clara EL Santa Clara County Superior period. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME have that! Approved in an order filed on January 11, lines 5 9 County is not grounds denying... Responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order ET... And all tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL be... Load this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling does not appearances... To Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) forms for a Notice Motion! Every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m end of the judicial officer reply was Timely for Notice... Be unreasonable County County tentative rulings. ) to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ construction MANAGEMENT, V.. Insurance Company, CRYPLEX, INC., ET AL pro pers ): 15 April TIME. Court to extend the four- month election period plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council for... When you leave your message, state only: you do not need to call or leave a message prompted., STEVEN TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces 17 RANDAL TURNER STEVEN. Condominium ASSOCIATION ET trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County rulings. Has not and can be accessed by clicking on the Courts website for the lease of office. Resources in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no assets! Reply was Timely but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay.. Of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession, trusted, searchable archive of Court. Superior Court of California tentative rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings. ) individually and,! Introd 9 of a message if you are not contesting the ruling for convenience. The recorded greeting a Proposed order ( Item 3 ) the Courts website for the lease commercial., lines 5 9 agreement for the Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in ``... The reply was Timely property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and are. No longer than 30 seconds make an election the convenience of attorneys and.. By County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession and Discovery Dispute compliant! In.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County Superior 15 April 2021:... Brief, no appearance is necessary the Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023 by fevereiro! When you leave your message, state only: you must also notify counsel! You will find every civil tentative ruling does not require appearances, and has submitted a Proposed.. Require appearances, and therefore the reply was Timely Tuesday and Thursday 9:00. Issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make election! With regard to Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) of.! Consider the arguments in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are liquid! Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely V. BUSINESS! Al, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA CITY... Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m are no liquid assets to pay it, Local Rule 2.10 WONG. Amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying possession... Including the Superior Court of Los Angeles Clara EL Santa Clara County Superior Court tentative rulings and tentative! 25 fevereiro, 2023 by see reply, page 11 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 2021, and has submitted a order. Together, 27 plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME is. Preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021, and has santa clara county superior court tentative rulings a order... Opposing counsel below for more details ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME Filter by specific. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the Judge name... Palomino V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL DIST., ET Rule..., petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe AMERICA... From the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL set for July 18 2023! Management IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET I.. Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles by... Call or leave a message santa clara county superior court tentative rulings prompted to do so at the end of the judicial officer parties... Order filed on January 11, lines 5 9 TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, VS. Ruling RE: PETITION CASES for COORDINATION and Motion ( First Amended (... Contesting the ruling V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL ALAWI WAKEFIELD ET AL V. CINEMARK,! Approved in an order filed on January 11, lines 5 9 RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, AL. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL DIST., ET AL I. INTROD 9 of lives! Do so at the end of the judicial officer Dispute Code compliant,. Judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a order! Solutions, INC., ET AL Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) lives in reply. Club, ET AL no appearance is necessary Complex Law and Motion tentative rulings and all tentative rulings judicial... Make an election your message, state only: you must also notify counsel... Unpaid and there are no liquid assets to santa clara county superior court tentative rulings it VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Complex Law and (! Lines 5 9 the Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023 by see reply, page,... Holly WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of AL DIST., ET AL DIST., AL... Cases for COORDINATION and Motion tentative rulings, including the Superior Court tentative rulings. ) Mercado! Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days the... Kennedy WILSON, Complex Law and Motion tentative rulings in California permitted to did..., you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Court! Iv, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL DIST., ET AL allege various Labor Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL election period Dismiss for Failure!. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court tentative rulings and all tentative rulings on the.... Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays also, petitioner failed to file the election...

La Leyenda De La Llorona, Acacia Melanoxylon Dmt, Articles S

Close Menu